+ ARM experts, Feifei and Ruifeng.
Need your further support for ARM NEON path.
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/87617/
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Valerio
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 22:20
> To: Wang, Haiyue ; Yang, Qiming
> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Aaron Conole ;
> dev@dpdk.org
>
"Wang, Haiyue" writes:
> Hi Paolo,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Wang, Haiyue
>> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 10:02
>> To: Paolo Valerio
>> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Aaron Conole ;
>> dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: RE: ixgbe and UDP with zero checksum
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From:
Hi Paolo,
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Haiyue
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 10:02
> To: Paolo Valerio
> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Aaron Conole ;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: ixgbe and UDP with zero checksum
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paolo Valerio
> > Sent: Thursday, Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Valerio
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 05:35
> To: Wang, Haiyue
> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Aaron Conole ;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: ixgbe and UDP with zero checksum
>
> "Wang, Haiyue" writes:
>
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> Fro
"Wang, Haiyue" writes:
> Hi Paolo,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paolo Valerio
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 21:50
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Wang, Haiyue ;
>> Aaron Conole
>>
>> Subject: ixgbe and UDP with zero checksum
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> performing some tests, I n
"Wang, Haiyue" writes:
> Hi Paolo,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paolo Valerio
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 21:50
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Wang, Haiyue ;
>> Aaron Conole
>>
>> Subject: ixgbe and UDP with zero checksum
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> performing some tests, I n
Hi Paolo,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Valerio
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 21:50
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Guo, Jia ; Wang, Haiyue ; Aaron
> Conole
>
> Subject: ixgbe and UDP with zero checksum
>
> Hi,
>
> performing some tests, I noticed that on ixgbe when receiving UDP
Hi,
performing some tests, I noticed that on ixgbe when receiving UDP
packets with zero checksum (no checksum) over IPv4, the corresponding
ol_flag for the l4 checksum is set to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD.
In particular, this apparently has an impact on OvS using ct() action
where UDP packets with zero
8 matches
Mail list logo