> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Stefan Baranoff
> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 2:18 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] i40evf: potential segfault
>
> Hi all!
>
> I was chasing a potential segfault and it appears, if I'm readi
On 8/20/2021 7:18 PM, Stefan Baranoff wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I was chasing a potential segfault and it appears, if I'm reading this
> driver correctly, that in i40evf_init_vf() the value vf->adapter->eth_dev
> is never set like pf->adapter->eth_dev is in eth_i40e_dev_init().
>
> I believe this is l
Hi all!
I was chasing a potential segfault and it appears, if I'm reading this
driver correctly, that in i40evf_init_vf() the value vf->adapter->eth_dev
is never set like pf->adapter->eth_dev is in eth_i40e_dev_init().
I believe this is leading to a segfault when something like
i40e_recv_scattere
3 matches
Mail list logo