Re: [dpdk-dev] ebpf support in dpdk

2017-04-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:23:13 +0530 Anupam Kapoor wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > > > I have a feeling you are talking about P4 > > > ​well, not p4, but more specifically 'protocol-oblivious-forwarding' (POF). > ebpf can describe both match+action rules on dp

Re: [dpdk-dev] ebpf support in dpdk

2017-04-21 Thread Anupam Kapoor
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > I have a feeling you are talking about P4 ​well, not p4, but more specifically 'protocol-oblivious-forwarding' (POF). ebpf can describe both match+action rules on dpdk... -- kind regards anupam In the beginning was the lambda, and the la

Re: [dpdk-dev] ebpf support in dpdk

2017-04-21 Thread Gal Sagie
I have a feeling you are talking about P4 On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Anupam Kapoor wrote: > hi all, > > i was just wondering if there are plans on adding ebpf support in dpdk ? > imho, it would be pretty useful, among other things, in creating generic > (protocol oblivious) match+actio

[dpdk-dev] ebpf support in dpdk

2017-04-21 Thread Anupam Kapoor
hi all, i was just wondering if there are plans on adding ebpf support in dpdk ? imho, it would be pretty useful, among other things, in creating generic (protocol oblivious) match+action support in dpdk based forwarding elements. -- thank you kind regards anupam In the beginning was the lambda