[dpdk-dev] drivers/crypto sub-tree maintainer volunteer

2015-10-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-21 12:06, Declan Doherty: > On 21/10/15 10:34, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Should we create a separate mailing list and patchwork? > > personally I think keeping a single mailing list for the moment is > preferable. The mailing lists volume isn't so great yet I would say we need to reduce

[dpdk-dev] drivers/crypto sub-tree maintainer volunteer

2015-10-21 Thread Declan Doherty
On 21/10/15 10:34, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-10-21 10:26, Declan Doherty: >> I'm just following up on discussions from DPDK user space and the on >> going discussions regarding the maintenance of development sub-trees >> etc. I just wanted to re-iterate my offer to maintain a sub-tree for the >

[dpdk-dev] drivers/crypto sub-tree maintainer volunteer

2015-10-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-21 10:26, Declan Doherty: > I'm just following up on discussions from DPDK user space and the on > going discussions regarding the maintenance of development sub-trees > etc. I just wanted to re-iterate my offer to maintain a sub-tree for the > cryptodev library and all crypto PMDs in dr

[dpdk-dev] drivers/crypto sub-tree maintainer volunteer

2015-10-21 Thread Declan Doherty
Hi all, I'm just following up on discussions from DPDK user space and the on going discussions regarding the maintenance of development sub-trees etc. I just wanted to re-iterate my offer to maintain a sub-tree for the cryptodev library and all crypto PMDs in drivers/crypto. Thomas, I will lea