Re: [dpdk-dev] decision process and DPDK scope

2017-02-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-09 11:54, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > I suggest that the technical board should check whether every new > > proposed features are explained, discussed and approved enough in > > the community. > > I assume you don't mean every

Re: [dpdk-dev] decision process and DPDK scope

2017-02-09 Thread O'Driscoll, Tim
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > Hi all, > > When DPDK was a small project, it was easy to propose a major change, > get feedback from the few contributors and figure a decision. > It had the drawback of the lack of various point of views. > So we probabl

[dpdk-dev] decision process and DPDK scope

2017-02-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi all, When DPDK was a small project, it was easy to propose a major change, get feedback from the few contributors and figure a decision. It had the drawback of the lack of various point of views. So we probably made some quick and wrong decisions. As the community is growing, we need to improv