Hi Akhil,
Thanks for your feedback Declan,
The suggestion from Fiona looks good. Should I send the patch for this
or is it already in discussion in some different thread?
Also, if this new API is added, there would be corresponding change in
the ipsec-secgw application as well.
I am look
Hi Akhil,
> -Original Message-
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 2:45 PM
> To: Akhil Goyal ; Doherty, Declan
> ; dev@dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> ; Jain, Deepak K
> Cc: hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Trahe, Fiona
> Subject: RE: cryptodev - Session and queue pair relat
Hi Akhil
> -Original Message-
> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.go...@nxp.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 2:39 PM
> To: Doherty, Declan ; dev@dpdk.org; De Lara
> Guarch, Pablo ; Jain, Deepak K
>
> Cc: hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Trahe, Fiona
> Subject: Re: cryptodev - Session and queu
On 2/8/2017 2:22 AM, Declan Doherty wrote:
On 06/02/17 13:35, Akhil Goyal wrote:
Hi,
Hey Akhil, see my thoughts inline
I have some issues w.r.t the mapping sessions and queue pairs.
As per my understanding:
- Number of sessions may be large – they are independent of number of
queue pairs
On 06/02/17 13:35, Akhil Goyal wrote:
Hi,
Hey Akhil, see my thoughts inline
I have some issues w.r.t the mapping sessions and queue pairs.
As per my understanding:
- Number of sessions may be large – they are independent of number of
queue pairs
Yes, cryptodev assumes no implicit connectio
Hi,
I have some issues w.r.t the mapping sessions and queue pairs.
As per my understanding:
- Number of sessions may be large – they are independent of number of
queue pairs
- Queue pairs are L-core specific
- Depending on the implementation, one queue pair can be mapped to many
sessions. Or,
6 matches
Mail list logo
