23/05/2013 23:41, Antti Kantee :
> On 23.05.2013 21:52, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> > Would you like to get it mainstream into the DPDK?
>
> I think currently integration makes sense only as some sort of a
> "reachover", i.e. source is not imported into the DPDK tree, but rather
> fetched on demand.
Vincent,
On 23.05.2013 21:52, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> We had to develop a complete logic from scratch (aka fast path logic) to
> get a TCP/IP stack with good performances for 6WIND (including some
> Openflow switching). Unfortunately, as part of our DPDK opensource
> contribution, we do not plan t
Hi Antti,
We had to develop a complete logic from scratch (aka fast path logic) to
get a TCP/IP stack with good performances for 6WIND (including some
Openflow switching). Unfortunately, as part of our DPDK opensource
contribution, we do not plan to publish under open source our 6WINDGate
stac
On 23.05.2013 21:20, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> I'm aware of the paper you linked given that I wrote it. I don't agree
>> that it supports your claim "already done several times before".
>
> I was more worried about multiple different TCP-IP stacks that seem
> to be only used by small number of p
On 23.05.2013 20:39, Daniel Cegie?ka wrote:
> 2013/5/23 Robert Bays :
>
>> Of course. And many more times than that. This is one more option for us
>> and it is BSD licensed.
>>
>> Ultimately, we will probably need a TCP stack in there.
>
> indeed, but what do you mean by the TCP stack? I hope n
On 23.05.2013 19:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Already done several times before.
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/
> https://code.google.com/p/tcp-ip-in-user-space/
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/tcp-ip-in-user-space
> http://www.ioremap.net/projects/unetstack
> http://www.joerch.or
2013/5/23 Robert Bays :
> Of course. And many more times than that. This is one more option for us
> and it is BSD licensed.
>
> Ultimately, we will probably need a TCP stack in there.
indeed, but what do you mean by the TCP stack? I hope not the BSD sockets :)
rx/tx bufs+simple API is all you
Hi,
I like the opportunities that a technology like DPDK enables, and I felt
that the availability of an open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK could make
things even more interesting. I've been working on a concept called the
anykernel, where the idea is that an OS kernel should be structured in a
-Original Message-
From: Antti Kantee
Date: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:53 AM
To: "dev at dpdk.org"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] announcing rump kernel TCP/IP stack for DPDK
>On 23.05.2013 20:39, Daniel Cegie?ka wrote:
>> 2013/5/23 Robert Bays :
>>
>>> Of cour
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:46:02 +0200
Antti Kantee wrote:
> On 23.05.2013 19:34, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Already done several times before.
> > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/
> > https://code.google.com/p/tcp-ip-in-user-space/
> > http://www.ohloh.net/p/tcp-ip-in-user-space
> >
On May 23, 2013, at 10:34 AM, "Stephen Hemminger" wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:40:38 +0200
> Antti Kantee wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I like the opportunities that a technology like DPDK enables, and I felt
>> that the availability of an open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK could using
>> real
On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:40:38 +0200
Antti Kantee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the opportunities that a technology like DPDK enables, and I felt
> that the availability of an open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK could make
> things even more interesting. I've been working on a concept called the
> any
12 matches
Mail list logo
