Re: [dpdk-dev] af_packet dev default "framesz" of 2048B

2018-11-20 Thread Lam, Tiago
On 16/11/2018 17:20, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 11/15/2018 7:02 PM, Lam, Tiago wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room >> available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the >> consequence of breaking the initialisation of eth_

Re: [dpdk-dev] af_packet dev default "framesz" of 2048B

2018-11-16 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 11/15/2018 7:02 PM, Lam, Tiago wrote: > Hi guys, > > OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room > available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the > consequence of breaking the initialisation of eth_af_packets interfaces, > when using default val

Re: [dpdk-dev] af_packet dev default "framesz" of 2048B

2018-11-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 07:02:37PM +, Lam, Tiago wrote: > Hi guys, > > OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room > available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the > consequence of breaking the initialisation of eth_af_packets interfaces, > whe

Re: [dpdk-dev] af_packet dev default "framesz" of 2048B

2018-11-16 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 15-Nov-18 7:02 PM, Lam, Tiago wrote: Hi guys, OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the consequence of breaking the initialisation of eth_af_packets interfaces, when using default values ("optio

[dpdk-dev] af_packet dev default "framesz" of 2048B

2018-11-15 Thread Lam, Tiago
Hi guys, OvS-DPDK has recently had small a change that changed the data room available in an mbuf (commit dfaf00e in OvS). This seems to have had the consequence of breaking the initialisation of eth_af_packets interfaces, when using default values ("options:dpdk- devargs=eth_af_packet0,iface=enp6