@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] about IOVA and namespace in DPDK 19.05
On 02-May-19 12:31 AM, Robert Nie wrote:
> After some digging, I fixed it by using "--iova-mode=va". Would anyone please
> let me know if it was safe to use "va" instead of "pa" for veth u
On 02-May-19 12:31 AM, Robert Nie wrote:
After some digging, I fixed it by using "--iova-mode=va". Would anyone please let me know if it was
safe to use "va" instead of "pa" for veth use case? Or any performance drops?
That depends.
The IOVA addresses are what you would colloquially refer t
Hello,
I am take a trial on AF_XDP feature of 19.05-rc2. I encountered two problems.
One is about "iova-mode", another is about attaching bpf prog onto interface of
specified namespace (probably new feature?)
I created a VM using uvt-tool, release=eoan, cpu=8, mem=8G, with
host-passthrough ena
3 matches
Mail list logo