[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options

2013-09-19 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
Thanks Keith ! Your inputs are really helpful. I'll keep the contacts handy. Regards, -Sujith On 18/09/13 4:45 AM, "Wiles, Roger Keith" wrote: >Hi Sujith, > >Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network >acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP t

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options

2013-09-19 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
Thank you Gil. -Sujith On 17/09/13 6:39 PM, "Gil Hellmann" wrote: >Hi Sujith, > >To add to the respond given by Mr. Jardin, Wind River also has commercial >grade protocol stack that could be used with DPDK libraries and >application, it is part of Wind Rivers' INP (Intelligent Networking >Platf

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options

2013-09-17 Thread Wiles, Roger Keith
Hi Sujith, Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does). Wind Ri

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options

2013-09-17 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
Hi Vincent, Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful. I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think about the other options later. Regards, -Sujith On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" wrote: >Hi Sujith, > >NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options

2013-09-05 Thread Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
Hi all, I'm new to DPDK and this group. In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing. Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with DPDK libraries and applications? Quick goog