> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:22 AM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: Christian Ehrhardt ; dev
> ; Stephen Hemminger ; Thomas
> Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Suggestions for the dp
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 02:49:31PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Christian Ehrhardt
> > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:07 AM
> > To: dev ; Stephen Hemminger
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk
Hi,
On 05/20/2016 04:54 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> it would be great to have an actively maintained LTS release.
>
> Clearly all us "Distribution People" like Panu, Me and a few others should
> - whenever bugs are identified as potential backports - start the
> discussion.
> And having
minger
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Suggestions for the dpdk stable tree
> >
> > Hi,
> > I guess over time/releases less people mind the 2.2-stable.
> > But I still see a lot of people referring to 2.2 - so why not giving this
> > thread a ping again.
> >
&
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Christian Ehrhardt
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:07 AM
> To: dev ; Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Suggestions for the dpdk stable tree
>
> Hi,
> I guess over time/relea
Hi,
I guess over time/releases less people mind the 2.2-stable.
But I still see a lot of people referring to 2.2 - so why not giving this
thread a ping again.
ack / nack / opinions ?
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Christian Ehrh
Hi,
there is a stable tree for dpdk 2.2 at http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
But it is still at the 2.2 Release status.
I was working on testing 2.2 and needed to pull in some patches from post
2.2 release to fix issues.
After that I started to "scan" the git log what else might apply to a clean
7 matches
Mail list logo
