On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:23:10PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 10/20/2017 02:58 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:07:17PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > On 10/20/2017 04:18 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > > > Therefore, how about adding min_rx/tx_burst_sz in struc
On 10/20/2017 02:58 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:07:17PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
On 10/20/2017 04:18 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
Therefore, how about adding min_rx/tx_burst_sz in struct rte_eth_dev_info and
have PMDs fill it in on dev_ops->dev_infos_get() so as to m
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:07:17PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 10/20/2017 04:18 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > Therefore, how about adding min_rx/tx_burst_sz in struct rte_eth_dev_info
> > and
> > have PMDs fill it in on dev_ops->dev_infos_get() so as to make apps comply
> > with
> > it.
>
On 10/20/2017 04:18 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
Therefore, how about adding min_rx/tx_burst_sz in struct rte_eth_dev_info and
have PMDs fill it in on dev_ops->dev_infos_get() so as to make apps comply with
it.
Just for my understand, what should happen if application wants to send only
one packet?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:18:18AM +, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In some rx_burst functions, especially for vectorized ones (e.g.
> i40e_rxtx_vec*
> or mlx5_rxtx_vec*), there's actually a requirement of min burst size.
>
> As it manipulates 4 packets simultaneously in a loop, if nb_pkts o
Hi,
In some rx_burst functions, especially for vectorized ones (e.g. i40e_rxtx_vec*
or mlx5_rxtx_vec*), there's actually a requirement of min burst size.
As it manipulates 4 packets simultaneously in a loop, if nb_pkts of
rte_eth_rx_burst() is less than 4, it just returns without sending a packet
6 matches
Mail list logo
