Hi,
On 01/29/2015 01:56 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
> Another thing you can do is to retry on the latest stable dpdk which
> is known to work (see csumonly.c in test-pmd).
>
> Let me add further, I am _just_ doing the UDP checksum offload
> and not
> the IP hdr c
Hi Olivier,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Olivier MATZ
wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
>
>
> On 01/28/2015 03:57 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
>
>> I am using dpdk 1.6r1, intel 82599 NIC.
I have an mbuf, I have hand-constructed a UDP packet (IPv4) in
the data
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Olivier MATZ
wrote:
> Hi Prashant,
>
>
> On 01/28/2015 12:25 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am aware that this topic has been discussed several times before, but I
>> am somehow still stuck with this.
>>
>> I am using dpdk 1.6r1, intel 82599 NIC.
>
Hi,
I am aware that this topic has been discussed several times before, but I
am somehow still stuck with this.
I am using dpdk 1.6r1, intel 82599 NIC.
I have an mbuf, I have hand-constructed a UDP packet (IPv4) in the data
portion, filled the relevant fields of the headers and I do a tx burst. N
Hi Prashant,
On 01/28/2015 03:57 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
>>> I am using dpdk 1.6r1, intel 82599 NIC.
>>> I have an mbuf, I have hand-constructed a UDP packet (IPv4) in
>>> the data
>>> portion, filled the relevant fields of the headers and I do a tx
>>>
Hi Prashant,
On 01/28/2015 12:25 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am aware that this topic has been discussed several times before, but I
> am somehow still stuck with this.
>
> I am using dpdk 1.6r1, intel 82599 NIC.
> I have an mbuf, I have hand-constructed a UDP packet (IPv4) in the da
6 matches
Mail list logo