[dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support

2014-02-18 Thread Mauro Annarumma
s it right? Is it true also if I disable the mempool per-core cache? Thanks for your help, regards. Mauro > From: bruce.richardson at intel.com > To: mauroannarumma at hotmail.it; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support > Date: Mon, 17 F

[dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support

2014-02-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
pdk.org] On Behalf Of Mauro > Annarumma > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:46 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support > > Hi Bruce, >just for dispel > any doubt: if there is one primary process and N secondary processe

[dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support

2014-02-17 Thread Mauro Annarumma
Hi, I have some doubts on the DPDK multi-process support: 1) According to the Programmers Guide (pag. 109 - 20.3 Multi-process Limitations), one of the multi-process limitations is: "All Intel? DPDK processes running as a single application and using shared memory must have distinct coremask ar

[dpdk-dev] Question on DPDK multi-process support

2014-02-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> Hi, > I have some doubts on the DPDK multi-process support: > > 1) According to the Programmers Guide (pag. 109 - 20.3 Multi-process > Limitations), one of the multi-process limitations is: > > "All Intel(r) DPDK processes running as a single application and using shared > memory must have dist