> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mcnamara, John
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:59 AM
> To: Neil Horman
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposal for a new Committer model
>
> > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 7:12 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposal for a new Committer model
>
> > ...
> >
> > B) Desig
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:20:50AM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > Repost from the moving at dpdk.org mailing list to get a wider audience.
> > Original thread:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/59.html
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:53:55PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:19:19PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:41:20PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > > Could we define some of the poten
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:17:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-23 15:13, Neil Horman:
> > Can either you or thomas provide some detail as to how you are doing patch
> > management between trees (details of the commands you use are what I would
> > be
> > interested in). It sounds to me
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:19:19PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:41:20PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > Could we define some of the potential subtrees now and look to
> > > > introduce them in the this rel
2016-11-23 15:13, Neil Horman:
> Can either you or thomas provide some detail as to how you are doing patch
> management between trees (details of the commands you use are what I would be
> interested in). It sounds to me like there may be some optimization to be made
> here before we even make cha
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Could we define some of the potential subtrees now and look to introduce
> > them in the this release cycle? EAL and the Core libs, as suggested by
> > Thomas, seem like 2 obvious ones.
> >
> Sure, I'd suggest the following:
I wou
On 11/23/2016 3:33 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:01:44PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 11/23/2016 1:48 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:56:23PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/22/2016 7:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:41:20PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > Could we define some of the potential subtrees now and look to introduce
> > > them in the this release cycle? EAL and the Core libs, as suggested by
> > > Thomas, see
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:21:00PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 3:33 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:01:44PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >> On 11/23/2016 1:48 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:56:23PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11
On 11/23/2016 1:48 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:56:23PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 11/22/2016 7:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
2016-11-18 13:09, Neil Horman:
> A) Further promote subtree maintainer
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:01:44PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 1:48 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:56:23PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >> On 11/22/2016 7:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 20
ra, John
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposal for a new Committer model
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-11-18 13:09, Neil Horman:
> > > > A) Further promote subtree maintainership. This was a conversa
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:56:23PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/22/2016 7:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-11-18 13:09, Neil Horman:
> >>> A) Further promote subtree maintainership. This was a conversation that I
> >>> p
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 7:52 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposal for a new Committer model
>
> On Mon, Nov 21,
On 11/22/2016 7:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2016-11-18 13:09, Neil Horman:
>>> A) Further promote subtree maintainership. This was a conversation that I
>>> proposed some time ago, but my proposed granularity was discarded in favo
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:52:41AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-18 13:09, Neil Horman:
> > A) Further promote subtree maintainership. This was a conversation that I
> > proposed some time ago, but my proposed granularity was discarded in favor
> > of something that hasn't worked as well
2016-11-18 13:09, Neil Horman:
> A) Further promote subtree maintainership. This was a conversation that I
> proposed some time ago, but my proposed granularity was discarded in favor
> of something that hasn't worked as well (in my opinion). That is to say a
> few driver pmds (i40e and fm10k com
why aren't some patches as marked trivial and accepted right away.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jerin Jacob <
jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:20:50AM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > Rep
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:20:50AM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > Repost from the moving at dpdk.org mailing list to get a wider audience.
> > Original thread:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/59.html
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:20:50AM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> Repost from the moving at dpdk.org mailing list to get a wider audience.
> Original thread: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/59.html
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose a change to the DPDK committer model. Curre
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 09:20:50AM +, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> One committer to master represents a single point of failure and at times can
> be inefficient.
I have a lot more issues because of slow or inconclusive review of patches
than I do because of committers. Often times they just get
Repost from the moving at dpdk.org mailing list to get a wider audience.
Original thread: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/59.html
Hi,
I'd like to propose a change to the DPDK committer model. Currently we have one
committer for the master branch of the DPDK project.
One c
24 matches
Mail list logo
