Re: [dpdk-dev] Process for removing __rte_experimental

2018-05-25 Thread Neil Horman
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:05:34PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > While reading through [1], I couldn't understand if __rte_experimental and > EXPERIMENTAL tag removed from code and map file, respectively, are > categorized under ABI breakage or not. Thus, whether deprecation for them > should be s

Re: [dpdk-dev] Process for removing __rte_experimental

2018-05-25 Thread Shreyansh Jain
> -Original Message- > From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:bl...@debian.org] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 3:47 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon ; Shreyansh Jain > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ferruh Yigit ; > nhor...@tuxdriver.com > Subject: Re: Process for removing __rte_experimental > > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 11

Re: [dpdk-dev] Process for removing __rte_experimental

2018-05-25 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 25/05/2018 11:35, Shreyansh Jain: > > While reading through [1], I couldn't understand if > > __rte_experimental  > > and EXPERIMENTAL tag removed from code and map file, respectively, > > are  > > categorized under ABI breakage or not. Th

Re: [dpdk-dev] Process for removing __rte_experimental

2018-05-25 Thread Thomas Monjalon
25/05/2018 11:35, Shreyansh Jain: > While reading through [1], I couldn't understand if __rte_experimental > and EXPERIMENTAL tag removed from code and map file, respectively, are > categorized under ABI breakage or not. Thus, whether deprecation for > them should be sent or not in a release cyc

[dpdk-dev] Process for removing __rte_experimental

2018-05-25 Thread Shreyansh Jain
While reading through [1], I couldn't understand if __rte_experimental and EXPERIMENTAL tag removed from code and map file, respectively, are categorized under ABI breakage or not. Thus, whether deprecation for them should be sent or not in a release cycle for removal in subsequent release. L