--Shahaf
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:47 PM
To: Shahaf Shuler
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; george@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Port stats zero when using MLX5 DPDK driver
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 a
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > It is not support on Mellanox PMD to read the primary process counters
> > from a secondary process.
It is a pity that such a basic feature is not supported.
We should try to have this kind of feature better supported across
every driver
equal to the number of
packet/bytes which were send/received on the PMD.
--Shahaf
From: george@gmail.com [mailto:george@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 4:45 PM
To: Shahaf Shuler
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Port stats zero when using MLX5 DPDK driver
Hi Shahaf
Mellanox PMD to read the primary process counters
> from a secondary process.
>
>
> --Shahaf
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of george@gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2017 3:38 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subj
-dev] Port stats zero when using MLX5 DPDK driver
Hi,
I have a simple setup with a machine that contains a dual port 10 GbE Intel
82599ES NIC and another dual port 100 GbE Mellanox ConnectX-4 NIC. The Intel
ports are 0 and 1, while the Mellanox ones are 2 and 3.
I properly compiled DPDK 16.11 and
Hi,
I have a simple setup with a machine that contains a dual port 10 GbE Intel
82599ES NIC and another dual port 100 GbE Mellanox ConnectX-4 NIC. The
Intel ports are 0 and 1, while the Mellanox ones are 2 and 3.
I properly compiled DPDK 16.11 and test-pmd works just fine for all 4 ports.
Then, I
6 matches
Mail list logo
