Re: [dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville

2018-02-21 Thread Xing, Beilei
ilto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Katiyar > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:48 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Venkatesan Pradeep > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville > > > > Hi, > > Resending the queries with change

Re: [dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville

2018-02-14 Thread Nitin Katiyar
Fortville Hi Nitin, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Katiyar > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:48 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Venkatesan Pradeep > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville > > Hi,

Re: [dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville

2018-02-13 Thread Xing, Beilei
Hi Nitin, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Katiyar > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:48 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Venkatesan Pradeep > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville > > Hi, >

[dpdk-dev] Multi-driver support for Fortville

2018-02-12 Thread Nitin Katiyar
Hi, Resending the queries with change in subject line. 1) With these patches, we have 2 different values for some of the global registers depending upon whether single driver or multi-driver is using all ports of the NIC. Does it impact any functionality/performance if we use DPDK drivers in sin