25/05/2018 15:57, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:20:42PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> > Thanks, Thomas.
> >
> > Actually there is an EAL rte_eal_check_module() method which does this
> > exactly:
> > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c#n1089
> > It i
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:20:42PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Thanks, Thomas.
>
> Actually there is an EAL rte_eal_check_module() method which does this
> exactly:
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c#n1089
> It is declared in eal_private.h.
>
> Is it reasonable
Thanks, Thomas.
Actually there is an EAL rte_eal_check_module() method which does this exactly:
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c#n1089
It is declared in eal_private.h.
Is it reasonable to send a patch which moves the decalartion to eal.h
instead so PMDs can use i
25/05/2018 11:55, Kevin Wilson:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing the following issue in DPDK 18.05-rc5 (I saw it also with earlier
> releases of DPDK from the last year). The issue is with defining
> dependency on a kernel module in a PMD.
> I want to develop a PMD which requiers that before running DPDK app
Hi,
I am facing the following issue in DPDK 18.05-rc5 (I saw it also with earlier
releases of DPDK from the last year). The issue is with defining
dependency on a kernel module in a PMD.
I want to develop a PMD which requiers that before running DPDK app which
uses this PMD, a specified kernel mod
5 matches
Mail list logo