Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-10-01 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:16 PM Stephen Hemminger < > > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:02:53 -0500 > > > Jay Rolette wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stephen Hemminger < > > > > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I

Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-09-21 Thread Wang, Zhihong
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 5:39 AM > To: Stephen Hemminger > Cc: DPDK > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3

Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-09-20 Thread Jay Rolette
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:16 PM Stephen Hemminger < step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:02:53 -0500 > Jay Rolette wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stephen Hemminger < > > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > > > I wonder if KNI is claiming performance that

Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-09-20 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:02:53 -0500 Jay Rolette wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stephen Hemminger < > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > I wonder if KNI is claiming performance that was never measured on current > > CPU, OS, DPDK. > > > > With single stream and TCP testing on IXG

Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-09-20 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:02:53 -0500 Jay Rolette wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stephen Hemminger < > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > I wonder if KNI is claiming performance that was never measured on current > > CPU, OS, DPDK. > > > > With single stream and TCP testing on IXG

Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-09-20 Thread Jay Rolette
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stephen Hemminger < step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > I wonder if KNI is claiming performance that was never measured on current > CPU, OS, DPDK. > > With single stream and TCP testing on IXGBE (DPDK), I see lowest > performance with KNI. > > Rx

[dpdk-dev] KNI performance is not what is claimed

2018-09-20 Thread Stephen Hemminger
I wonder if KNI is claiming performance that was never measured on current CPU, OS, DPDK. With single stream and TCP testing on IXGBE (DPDK), I see lowest performance with KNI. Rx Tx KNI 3.2 Gbit/sec1.3 Gbit/sec TAP 4.9 4.7