Danny,
On 23/09/14 18:38, Zhou, Danny wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:39 PM
>> To: Marc Sune
>> Cc: ; dev-team at bisdn.de
>> Subject: Re: [dpd
use DPDK to rx/tx packets in your box.
From: Jay Rolette [mailto:role...@infiniteio.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 2:53 AM
To: Zhou, Danny
Cc: Marc Sune; ; dev-team at bisdn.de
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI and memzones
I can't discuss product details openly yet, but I'm happy
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:39 PM
> To: Marc Sune
> Cc: ; dev-team at bisdn.de
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI and memzones
>
> *> p.s. Lately someone involved
lette [mailto:rolette at infiniteio.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 24, 2014 2:53 AM
> *To:* Zhou, Danny
> *Cc:* Marc Sune; ; dev-team at bisdn.de
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI and memzones
>
>
>
> I can't discuss product details openly yet, but I'm happy to have a
gt;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:39 PM
> > To: Marc Sune
> > Cc: ; dev-team at bisdn.de
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] KNI and memzones
> >
>
Hi all,
So we are having some problems with KNI. In short, we have a DPDK
application that creates KNI interfaces and destroys them during its
lifecycle and connecting them to DOCKER containers. Interfaces may
eventually be even named the same (see below).
We were wondering why even calling rt
*> p.s. Lately someone involved with DPDK said KNI would be deprecated in
future DPDK releases; I haven't read or listen to this before, is this
true? What would be the natural replacement then?*
KNI is a non-trivial part of the product I'm in the process of building.
I'd appreciate someone "in th
7 matches
Mail list logo
