Hi, Sabu and Bruce:
I saw your post in the mailing list about I350 fails to send packets,
however it is posted about one year ago.
Now we have encountered the same issue.
We are now building a forwarding device which forwards packets between 2
I350 ports, and we observe that the
t;
bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>
> > From: sabu kurian [mailto:sabu2kurian at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:54 AM
> > To: Richardson, Bruce
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK
> >
>
k.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK
> >
> > I have asked a similar question before, no one replied though.
> >
> > I'm crafting my own packets in mbuf's (74 byte packets all) and sending
> it
> > using
> >
> > re
I have asked a similar question before, no one replied though.
I'm crafting my own packets in mbuf's (74 byte packets all) and sending it
using
ret = rte_eth_tx_burst(port_ids[lcore_id], 0, m_pool,burst_size);
When burst_size is 1, it does work. Work in the sense the NIC will continue
with sendi
> From: sabu kurian [mailto:sabu2kurian at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:54 AM
> To: Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK
>
> Hai bruce,
> Thanks for the reply.
> I even tried that before
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of sabu kurian
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 10:42 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel I350 fails to work with DPDK
>
> I have asked a similar question before, no one rep
6 matches
Mail list logo
