s bug?
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Shyam Shrivastav [mailto:shrivastav.sh...@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* 2018年10月20日 13:23
> *收件人:* lidejun
> *抄送:* users ; dev@dpdk.org; Lichunhe (Cloud Networking) <
> lichu...@huawei.com>; Wangliefeng
> *主题:* Re: [dpdk-dev] IPV4/IPV6 TCP/UDP Pseud
Realized my answer is confusing, I meant to say that code is correct as
pseudo ipv4/ipv6 headers for the purpose of checksum calculations doesn't
include options or extension headers, see udp wiki or corresponding rfcs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 1
that is correct , pseudo header doesn't include ipv4 options or ipv6
extension headers ..
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 9:02 AM lidejun wrote:
> Has anybody used the following two APIs calculating ipv4&ipv6 tcp/udp
> pseudo header checksum?
>
> 1.rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum
>
> 2.rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum
>
Has anybody used the following two APIs calculating ipv4&ipv6 tcp/udp pseudo
header checksum?
1.rte_ipv4_phdr_cksum
2.rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum
The ipv4 version does not exclude ip options and ipv6 version does not exclude
extersion headers.
4 matches
Mail list logo