Hi Stephen,
> The problem is that doing the initialization requires duplicating all the
> logic to
> probe the PCI bus and do blacklisting etc in the startup application.
Not quite sure what you're referring to here, could you please elaborate a bit
more? If you mean the EAL PCI probing and bla
Hi Stephen,
> I actually liked the unbind code that was there. It meant that additional
> logic
> did not have to be added to the startup script to do PCI discovery and
> finding/mapping devices.
>
> As it is the EAL startup process is a bit of a mess. It assumes that various
> bits
> of inform
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 08:57:54 +
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> > I actually liked the unbind code that was there. It meant that additional
> > logic
> > did not have to be added to the startup script to do PCI discovery and
> > finding/mapping devices.
> >
> > As it is the EAL
inal issue.
Regards
-Prashant
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Burakov, Anatoly
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 2:29 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] IGB_UIO port unbinding
Hi Prashant,
> There was a usecase with ESXi VMXNET3 NIC where
Hi,
2014-04-10 21:34, Prashant Upadhyaya:
> There was a usecase with ESXi VMXNET3 NIC where I had to use this parameter
> set to Y to make it work. So kindly ensure that the initialization of
> vmxnet3 NIC is not vulnerable.
This issue is fixed by this commit:
http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:39:35 +
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> As you may or may not know, the CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS was deprecated in
> the official Intel(r) DPDK 1.6.0 release package. However, the code itself
> (e.g. in lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal_pci.c and other place
Hi Prashant,
> I might have used the term 'initialization' in a wrong fashion.
> But I have confirmed, the issue was related to this commit (which Thomas
> brought to my notice) --
>
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=18f02ff75949de9c2468
>
> The above should get you the context for the or
Hi Prashant,
> There was a usecase with ESXi VMXNET3 NIC where I had to use this
> parameter set to Y to make it work.
> So kindly ensure that the initialization of vmxnet3 NIC is not vulnerable.
>
Did you try it on the latest 1.6.x code (that option was removed)?
More to the point, I can't see
Monjalon
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:10 PM
To: Burakov, Anatoly
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] IGB_UIO port unbinding
Hi,
2014-04-10 09:39, Burakov, Anatoly:
> As you may or may not know, the CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS was
> deprecated in the official Intel(r) DPDK 1.6.0 r
Hi,
2014-04-10 09:39, Burakov, Anatoly:
> As you may or may not know, the CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS was deprecated
> in the official Intel(r) DPDK 1.6.0 release package. However, the code
> itself (e.g. in lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal_pci.c and other places) to
> support that config option was no
Hi everyone
As you may or may not know, the CONFIG_RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS was deprecated in
the official Intel(r) DPDK 1.6.0 release package. However, the code itself
(e.g. in lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal_pci.c and other places) to support that
config option was not removed. My question would be,
11 matches
Mail list logo
