On 6/25/2021 2:26 PM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> Hi Ferruh, all,
>
> Let's please discuss another approach to setting KNI link status before
> making this API stable:
> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20190925093623.18419-1-iryz...@nfware.com/
>
> I explained the problem with the current imp
Hi Ferruh, all,
Let's please discuss another approach to setting KNI link status before
making this API stable:
http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20190925093623.18419-1-iryz...@nfware.com/
I explained the problem with the current implementation there.
More than that, using ioctl approach
Sounds more than reasonable, +1 from me.
Ray K
On 24/06/2021 14:24, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/24/2021 11:42 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
>> Hi Ferruh,
>>
>> The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11
>> release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to
On 6/24/2021 11:42 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
>
> The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11
> release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part
> of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at
Hi Ferruh,
The following kni experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and v19.11
release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part of
the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at this
point.
* rte_kni_update_link
Ray K
5 matches
Mail list logo
