[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-22 Thread BYEONG-GI KIM
rocess >Flow control >Whitelist >blacklist >vlan > > Regards, > Cao Min > > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:04 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread BYEONG-GI KIM
PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the >> TX >> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16. >> >> >> >> >> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 0 ... rxq=0,0,0 >> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 1 ... rxq=0,1,0 >> >

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread Masaru Oki
=1,0,0 > >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 3 ... rxq=1,1,0 > >> > >> Checking link status.done > >> Port 0 Link Up - speed 100 Mbps - full-duplex > >> Port 1 Link Up - speed 100 Mbps - full-duplex > >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread BYEONG-GI KIM
id=1 >> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=3 portid=1 rxqueueid=1 >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 0 >> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=0 portid=0 rxqueueid=0 >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 2 >> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=2 portid=1 rxqueueid=0 >> >> Anyway, I'll also try to te

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread BYEONG-GI KIM
FWD: entering main loop on lcore 3 >> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=1 portid=0 rxqueueid=1 >> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=3 portid=1 rxqueueid=1 >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 0 >> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=0 portid=0 rxqueueid=0 >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 2 >> L3FWD: -

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread Masaru Oki
=0 rxqueueid=0 > L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 2 > L3FWD: -- lcoreid=2 portid=1 rxqueueid=0 > > Anyway, I'll also try to test the testpmd application. > > Best regards > > Byeong-Gi KIM > > > > 2014-08-21 17:56 GMT+09:00 De Lara Guarch, Pablo < > pa

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread BYEONG-GI KIM
.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>: > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:04 AM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > >

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread BYEONG-GI KIM
Hello. I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 on the DPDK testing machines, but it seems not working. Which sample application would be recommended to test the NIC actually works well with DPDK? Best regards Byeong-Gi KIM

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> > From: BYEONG-GI KIM [mailto:kimbyeonggi at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:09 AM > To: Masaru Oki; De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > It works fine with DPDK at least. > > The problem i

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:18 AM > To: Chae-yong Chong; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > Well, I did think that the NIC

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

2014-08-21 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:04 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > Hello. > > I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2