On 12/03/2019 20:46, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 19:12 +, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is about short term stable maintenance, ~3 months based on
>> n.02/05/08 DPDK. It is **not** referring/impacting DPDK LTS,
>> maintained
>> for ~2 years based on n.11 DPDK.
>>
>
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:51:37 +0100
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 12/03/2019 21:46, Luca Boccassi:
> > On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 19:12 +, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > > So what to do with short term stables? Some choices could be:
> > >
> > > - continue with short term stables for n.02/05/08
> > > - ad-
12/03/2019 21:46, Luca Boccassi:
> On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 19:12 +, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > So what to do with short term stables? Some choices could be:
> >
> > - continue with short term stables for n.02/05/08
> > - ad-hoc support for short term stables where community have an
> > interest
>
On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 19:12 +, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is about short term stable maintenance, ~3 months based on
> n.02/05/08 DPDK. It is **not** referring/impacting DPDK LTS,
> maintained
> for ~2 years based on n.11 DPDK.
>
> The effort and usefulness of short term stable m
Hi All,
This is about short term stable maintenance, ~3 months based on
n.02/05/08 DPDK. It is **not** referring/impacting DPDK LTS, maintained
for ~2 years based on n.11 DPDK.
The effort and usefulness of short term stable maintenance was raised
previously and in the last DPDK Release meeting [1
5 matches
Mail list logo
