[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-28 Thread Wiles, Roger Keith
Hi Matthew, On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:00 PM, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:13:43PM +, Wiles, Roger Keith wrote: >> Hi Everyone, > > Hi Keith, > > For me the build failed with clang but I made a series of awful patches to > get > it to compile... not sure if the clang fail

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Matthew Hall
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:13:43PM +, Wiles, Roger Keith wrote: > Hi Everyone, Hi Keith, For me the build failed with clang but I made a series of awful patches to get it to compile... not sure if the clang failures could be related to your scan-build failures. If it will help you I can pro

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Vincent JARDIN
> It's here: > https://scan.coverity.com > > Some checks have been done with TrustInSoft Analyzer: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002365.html > Noticeable example: > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=2612a4b935144accff Registered on coverity, anyone for the admi

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-08-27 15:52, Wiles, Roger Keith: > I groped around on the Coverity site and did not find any statement about > being free to open source, but I may have just missed it. It's here: https://scan.coverity.com Some checks have been done with TrustInSoft Analyzer: http://dpdk.org/

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Julien Cretin
Hi all! I took a look at the scan-results from Keith to compare with my analysis. My analysis is on test-pmd (called with a specific command-line and with start tx_first at the prompt) and scans exhaustively for all undefined behaviors (overflow, division by zero, invalid pointer dereference or

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Wiles, Roger Keith
Not sure why cite marks are missing again :-( I hope they come back some day. I still must not have Mac Mail configure correctly, but I only really see a couple of options. If someone has a solution let me know. On Aug 27, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-08-27 15:52, Wiles, R

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Wiles, Roger Keith
Nice, we had to buy one and that was not cheap :-) I groped around on the Coverity site and did not find any statement about being free to open source, but I may have just missed it. I did find that PC-Lint, Coverity, scan-build, ? all seem to test different parts of your code and some are bett

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Wiles, Roger Keith
Hi Everyone, I built dpdk with Clang and used the scan-build analyzer to produce a report. The report is about 13M in size so not very nice to send to the list. I decided to place the report on github.com if you want to see the results. While running scan-build the build would fail, but I force

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Jay Rolette
Here's the link you want: https://scan.coverity.com/ Check the FAQ for terms and you'll need to register the product, but I didn't see anything obvious that should get in the way from being able to use it for DPDK. Agree with Coverity not being cheap. I bought it for my last company. Really liked

[dpdk-dev] Clang Scan build results

2014-08-27 Thread Jay Rolette
*> We could run something like PC-Lint or Coverity, but they cost money :-)* Pretty sure Coverity is free for open source projects... Jay On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Wiles, Roger Keith < keith.wiles at windriver.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I built dpdk with Clang and used the scan-build