Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-26 Thread Xu, Rosen
Wu, Jingjing ; > dev@dpdk.org; Zhao1, Wei ; Guo, Jia > ; Yigit, Ferruh > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of > port > > 22/09/2020 05:04, Xu, Rosen: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Ipn3ke is based on ifpga_bus, and all ethdevs

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-24 Thread Rasesh Mody
Hi Thomas, >From: dev On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon >Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:16 PM > >The patches for removing RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE are sent: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- >3A__patches.dpdk.org_project_dpdk_list_-3Fseries- >3D12173&d=DwICAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0m

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
22/09/2020 05:04, Xu, Rosen: > Hi Thomas, > > Ipn3ke is based on ifpga_bus, and all ethdevs created from ipn3ke are > representors. > So it's no need to add RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE flags into ipn3ke driver. I don't understand how it is related. Do you mean it will work fine with the new close b

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-21 Thread Xu, Rosen
n Wang ; Guoyang Zhou > ; Min Hu (Connor) ; > Yisen Zhuang ; Alfredo Cardigliano > ; Jakub Grajciar ; Viacheslav > Ovsiienko ; Long Li ; > Martin Spinler ; Heinrich Kuhn > ; Harman Kalra ; > Nithin Dabilpuram ; Kiran Kumar K > ; Akhil Goyal ; Yigit, > Ferruh ; Thomas Monjalon

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-14 Thread Rahul Lakkireddy
On Monday, September 09/14/20, 2020 at 00:16:17 +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The patches for removing RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE are sent: > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=12173 > > 11 drivers are not supporting the new behaviour correctly: > bnx2x, cxgbe, dpaa, dp

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
The patches for removing RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE are sent: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=12173 11 drivers are not supporting the new behaviour correctly: bnx2x, cxgbe, dpaa, dpaa2, enetc, ionic, ipn3ke, liquidio, nfp, pfe, qede If you are the maintain

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-09-12 Thread Thomas Monjalon
03/08/2020 20:50, Thomas Monjalon: > 18/04/2019 12:59, Thomas Monjalon: > > Hi all, > > > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed > > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver: > > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close. > > This new b

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2020-08-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/04/2019 12:59, Thomas Monjalon: > Hi all, > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver: > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close. > This new behaviour is enabled per driver for a migration pe

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
30/04/2019 14:45, Nithin Dabilpuram: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:30:00PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 29/04/2019 18:51, Ferruh Yigit: > > > I would like to detail a little more what needs to be done, mainly for > > > the sake > > > of the discussion, please comment if something missing/wrong

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-30 Thread Nithin Dabilpuram
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:30:00PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 29/04/2019 18:51, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 4/18/2019 11:59 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed > > > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the drive

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-29 Thread Thomas Monjalon
29/04/2019 18:51, Ferruh Yigit: > On 4/18/2019 11:59 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed > > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver: > > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close. > > Th

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-29 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/18/2019 11:59 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi all, > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed > if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver: > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close. > This new behaviour is enabled per driver for a m

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 06:57:59 + Matan Azrad wrote: > Hi Thomas > > vdev_netvsc has no close API - should I change something there? > > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > Hi all, > > > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed if > > RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in

Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-27 Thread Matan Azrad
Hi Thomas vdev_netvsc has no close API - should I change something there? > From: Thomas Monjalon > Hi all, > > Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed if > RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver: > port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on

[dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of port

2019-04-18 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi all, Since DPDK 18.11, the behaviour of the close operation is changed if RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE is enabled in the driver: port is released (i.e. totally freed and data erased) on close. This new behaviour is enabled per driver for a migration period. Looking at the code, you can see these c