[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-28 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:45:43AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:56:16 + > "Zhang, Helin" wrote: > > > Based on my experience, only one or two users asked for ethtool support, > > then we have it. Before that time, we don?t have KNI ethtool support. > > I did not m

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-28 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:44:28 +0100 Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:45:43AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:56:16 + > > "Zhang, Helin" wrote: > > > > > Based on my experience, only one or two users asked for ethtool support, > > > then we have

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread Zhang, Helin
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:46 AM > To: Zhang, Helin > Cc: Jay Rolette; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread Zhang, Helin
From: Jay Rolette [mailto:role...@infiniteio.com] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:49 AM To: Zhang, Helin Cc: Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Zhang, Helin mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>>

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread Zhang, Helin
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:15 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin > Subject: BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel > > The network device ops handles changed again. > > Does KNI really need to ke

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread Jay Rolette
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:15 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin > > Subject: BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel > > > > The net

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:56:16 + "Zhang, Helin" wrote: > Based on my experience, only one or two users asked for ethtool support, then > we have it. Before that time, we don?t have KNI ethtool support. > I did not mean who uses KNI does not care about it, I mean for those users > who don?t us

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-08-26 17:15, Stephen Hemminger: > The network device ops handles changed again. > > Does KNI really need to keep yet another copy of the Intel driver code. > There already are 4 versions: > 1. Out-of tree base driver > 2. In-kernel mainline Linux driver > 3. DPDK driver > 4. KNI DPDK

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-27 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Hi Thomas, Stephen > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:42 AM > To: Stephen Hemminger > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel > > 2

[dpdk-dev] BUG - KNI broken in 4.2 kernel

2015-08-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The network device ops handles changed again. Does KNI really need to keep yet another copy of the Intel driver code. There already are 4 versions: 1. Out-of tree base driver 2. In-kernel mainline Linux driver 3. DPDK driver 4. KNI DPDK driver No wonder they can't stay in sync.