Hi John,
Thanks for your reply.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mcnamara, John [mailto:john.mcnamara at intel.com]
> AFAIK, timestamping of every packet isn't supported by ixgbe/i40e nics and I
> don't know about non-Intel nics. It was supported for some(?) igb nics and
> hence the patch you
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Montorsi, Francesco
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 9:26 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Accurate timestamps in received packets
>
> Hi Wenzhuo,
>
&
Hi Wenzhuo,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo [mailto:wenzhuo.lu at intel.com]
> Hi Francesco,
> Why not searching ieee1588 in the dpdk git repository? Surely you'll find
> something.
I tried using IEEE 1588 without success. In particular I enabled it at
build-time of DPDK and the
; Subject: [dpdk-dev] Accurate timestamps in received packets
>
> Hi all,
> I'm using rte_eth_rx_burst() to successfully retrieve packets from a DPDK-
> enabled port. I can process the packet and everything works fine. My only
> issue
> is that I cannot find any mean to retrieve
Hi all,
I'm using rte_eth_rx_burst() to successfully retrieve packets from a
DPDK-enabled port. I can process the packet and everything works fine. My only
issue is that I cannot find any mean to retrieve a timestamp for every single
packet. As a dirty-workaround I'm using gettimeofday() to time
5 matches
Mail list logo