24/04/2019 14:22, Ray Kinsella:
> On 24/04/2019 12:08, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> > To me, part of the problem is that DPDK is an "everything and the
> > kitchen sink" kind of library where there is a bunch of drivers, a whole
> > quasi-OS layer of dealing with hardware in a cross-platform manner, a
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:54:51 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> On 24-Apr-19 1:22 PM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> >
> > On 24/04/2019 12:08, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> >> On 23-Apr-19 3:12 PM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 18/04/2019 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18,
On 24-Apr-19 1:22 PM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
On 24/04/2019 12:08, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 23-Apr-19 3:12 PM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
On 18/04/2019 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:34:53AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Hon
On 24/04/2019 12:08, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 23-Apr-19 3:12 PM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18/04/2019 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:34:53AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote
On 23-Apr-19 3:12 PM, Ray Kinsella wrote:
On 18/04/2019 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:34:53AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Hello,
There was a conversation [1] in the context of RC
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:08:46AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > 2. If the situation is as in #1, but the structures in question are
> > > > passed to non-inline DPDK functions.
> On 18/04/2019 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:34:53AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
> Hello,
> There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I
> tho
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I
> > > > thought it needs participation from broader audience. Summary for
> > > > the context (please look at [1] for full detai
o: Honnappa Nagarahalli
>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger ;
>>> Ananyev, Konstantin ; tho...@monjalon.net;
>>> Ray Kinsella ; nd
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ABI and inline functions
>>>
>>>> 2) Every function that is not in
On 18/04/2019 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:34:53AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
Hello,
There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I thought
it nee
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:34:53AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I thought
> > > it needs participation from broader audience. Summary
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > Hello,
> > There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I thought
> > it needs participation from broader audience. Summary for the context
> > (please look at [1] for full details)
> >
>
> Thanks for
> > Ananyev, Konstantin ; tho...@monjalon.net;
> > Ray Kinsella ; nd
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ABI and inline functions
> >
> > > 2) Every function that is not in the direct datapath (fastpath?)
> > > should not be inline. Exceptions or things like
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:07 PM
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger ;
> Ananyev, Konstantin ; tho...@monjalon.net;
> Ray Kinsella ; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev]
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:36:38 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >
> > Coming to 1), I think DPDK cannot provide ABI compatibility unless all the
> > inline functions are converted to normal functions and symbol versioning is
> > done for those (not bothering about performance).
> >
> I disagre
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:12:43AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> Hello,
> There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I thought
> it needs participation from broader audience. Summary for the context (please
> look at [1] for full details)
>
Thanks for kicking off th
Hello,
There was a conversation [1] in the context of RCU library. I thought
it needs participation from broader audience. Summary for the context (please
look at [1] for full details)
1) How do we provide ABI compatibility when the code base contains inline
functions? Unless we freeze
17 matches
Mail list logo
