Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/3] add rx buffer size for rte_eth_rxq_info

2020-07-28 Thread Thomas Monjalon
You're right pinging for reviews. That's the right time to look at next features for those who have completed their 20.08 tasks. Feel free to review other pending patches in the meantime. Some of the next features are classified as "Deferred" in patchwork: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/3] add rx buffer size for rte_eth_rxq_info

2020-07-28 Thread Chengchang Tang
Hi Ferruh, Thank you for your reply. I'm sorry to bother you while you are busy with the release. I know this change may only be accepted in the next release. I'd like to know what the community thinks about it. If there is no objection, I will send the patch after current release out. On 2020/7/

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/3] add rx buffer size for rte_eth_rxq_info

2020-07-28 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 7/28/2020 7:29 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote: > Friendly ping Hi Tang, Sorry for not making it clear, since it is a library change, the change is already late for this release (20.08), and it will be considered for next release. As current release out, we can continue the discussions. > > On 202

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/3] add rx buffer size for rte_eth_rxq_info

2020-07-27 Thread Chengchang Tang
Friendly ping On 2020/7/22 14:38, Chengchang Tang wrote: > In common practice, PMD configure the rx buffer size which indicate the > buffer length could be used for hw in receiving packts according to the > data room size of the object in mempool. But in fact the final value is > related to the sp

[dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 0/3] add rx buffer size for rte_eth_rxq_info

2020-07-21 Thread Chengchang Tang
In common practice, PMD configure the rx buffer size which indicate the buffer length could be used for hw in receiving packts according to the data room size of the object in mempool. But in fact the final value is related to the specifications of hw, and its values will affect the number of fragm