You're right pinging for reviews. That's the right time to look at
next features for those who have completed their 20.08 tasks.
Feel free to review other pending patches in the meantime.
Some of the next features are classified as "Deferred" in patchwork:
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/
Hi Ferruh,
Thank you for your reply. I'm sorry to bother you while you are busy with
the release. I know this change may only be accepted in the next release.
I'd like to know what the community thinks about it. If there is no
objection, I will send the patch after current release out.
On 2020/7/
On 7/28/2020 7:29 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> Friendly ping
Hi Tang,
Sorry for not making it clear, since it is a library change, the change is
already late for this release (20.08), and it will be considered for next
release. As current release out, we can continue the discussions.
>
> On 202
Friendly ping
On 2020/7/22 14:38, Chengchang Tang wrote:
> In common practice, PMD configure the rx buffer size which indicate the
> buffer length could be used for hw in receiving packts according to the
> data room size of the object in mempool. But in fact the final value is
> related to the sp
In common practice, PMD configure the rx buffer size which indicate the
buffer length could be used for hw in receiving packts according to the
data room size of the object in mempool. But in fact the final value is
related to the specifications of hw, and its values will affect the number
of fragm
5 matches
Mail list logo
