caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add lock-less txq capability flag
>
> 27/04/2017 13:00, Jerin Jacob:
> > -Original Message-
> > > Which hardware supports it?
> >
> > Cavium OCTEONTX Packet transmission HW block(PKO).
> >
&g
..@intel.com, nipun.gu...@nxp.com,
> > santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add lock-less txq capability flag
> >
> > 21/04/2017 14:22, Jerin Jacob:
> > > if this flag is advertised by a PMD, Multiple threads can
caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add lock-less txq capability flag
>
> 21/04/2017 14:22, Jerin Jacob:
> > if this flag is advertised by a PMD, Multiple threads can
> > invoke rte_eth_tx_burst() concurrently on the same tx queue
> > without SW l
21/04/2017 14:22, Jerin Jacob:
> if this flag is advertised by a PMD, Multiple threads can
> invoke rte_eth_tx_burst() concurrently on the same tx queue
> without SW lock. This is an HW feature found in some NICs
> and useful in the following use cases if HW supports it.
Which hardware supports it
if this flag is advertised by a PMD, Multiple threads can
invoke rte_eth_tx_burst() concurrently on the same tx queue
without SW lock. This is an HW feature found in some NICs
and useful in the following use cases if HW supports it.
1) Remove explicit spinlock in some application where cores
to tx
5 matches
Mail list logo