org
> > Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo ; Yang, Qiming
> > ; sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix Segment
> > fault when start fwd
> >
> > On 9/17/2019 10:22 AM, Wang, ShougangX wrote:
> > >> Let's assume port alread
pdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix Segment
> fault when start fwd
>
> On 9/17/2019 10:22 AM, Wang, ShougangX wrote:
> >> Let's assume port already stopped before calling the reset, reset
> >> will cause port to be started.
> >
> > Indeed, automatic
On 9/17/2019 10:22 AM, Wang, ShougangX wrote:
>> Let's assume port already stopped before calling the reset, reset will cause
>> port
>> to be started.
>
> Indeed, automatically start looks strange in this case. User explicitly do
> the
> "port start" command should be better.
>
>> I am for us
> Let's assume port already stopped before calling the reset, reset will cause
> port
> to be started.
Indeed, automatically start looks strange in this case. User explicitly do the
"port start" command should be better.
> I am for user explicitly do the stop, reset and start commands, instead
On 9/16/2019 7:37 AM, Wang, ShougangX wrote:
> Hi Ferruh
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>> Not sure if 'reset' command should do more than it says, if there is a
>> requirement that port should be stopped, why not add this condition with an
>> error message so that user can stop the port in advance
Hi Ferruh
Thanks for your reply.
> Not sure if 'reset' command should do more than it says, if there is a
> requirement that port should be stopped, why not add this condition with an
> error message so that user can stop the port in advance if she wants.
Firstly, port must be stopped before res
On 9/6/2019 2:28 AM, Wang ShougangX wrote:
> This patch fixed the reset function to avoid crash when user don't
> call port reset , port stop and port start functions as sequence.
>
> Fixes: 97f1e19679 ("app/testpmd: add port reset command")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang ShougangX
7 matches
Mail list logo
