Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC UPDATE PATCH 0/9] dmadev rfc suggested updates

2021-07-07 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:46 AM fengchengwen wrote: > > LGTM, thanks > > And I'am prepare dmadev V2, include: > a) Fix code review comments (e.g. multiple-process support, doxygen, > comments, typo) > b) Flatten device abstraction to two layer: dmadev <> vchan I think we should not have "virtual"

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC UPDATE PATCH 0/9] dmadev rfc suggested updates

2021-07-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:16:44AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote: > LGTM, thanks > > And I'am prepare dmadev V2, include: a) Fix code review comments (e.g. > multiple-process support, doxygen, comments, typo) b) Flatten device > abstraction to two layer: dmadev <> vchan c) Public API use dev_id and >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC UPDATE PATCH 0/9] dmadev rfc suggested updates

2021-07-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:16:44AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote: > LGTM, thanks > > And I'am prepare dmadev V2, include: > a) Fix code review comments (e.g. multiple-process support, doxygen, > comments, typo) > b) Flatten device abstraction to two layer: dmadev <> vchan > c) Public API use dev_id a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC UPDATE PATCH 0/9] dmadev rfc suggested updates

2021-07-06 Thread fengchengwen
LGTM, thanks And I'am prepare dmadev V2, include: a) Fix code review comments (e.g. multiple-process support, doxygen, comments, typo) b) Flatten device abstraction to two layer: dmadev <> vchan c) Public API use dev_id and vchan_id to locate one vchan d) Using the flags parameter instead of the

[dpdk-dev] [RFC UPDATE PATCH 0/9] dmadev rfc suggested updates

2021-07-06 Thread Bruce Richardson
This patchset contains a series of changes to dmadev based on work being done to port over our drivers to test this new infrastructure. Some of these are bug fixes to enable compilation e.g. missing exports or meson.build files, while others are suggested changes to enhance the API. All these patch