Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] eventtimer: add default software implementation stub

2017-11-30 Thread Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:56:20PM +, Carrillo, Erik G wrote: > Hi Pavan, > > Response in-line: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula > > [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:35 AM > > To: Carrillo, Erik G > > Cc: de

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] eventtimer: add default software implementation stub

2017-11-30 Thread Carrillo, Erik G
Hi Pavan, Response in-line: > -Original Message- > From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula > [mailto:pbhagavat...@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 4:35 AM > To: Carrillo, Erik G > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nipun.gu...@nxp.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Rao, > Nikhil ; jerin.jacob

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] eventtimer: add default software implementation stub

2017-11-29 Thread Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:40:07AM -0600, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote: > If an eventdev PMD does not wish to provide event timer adapter ops > definitions, the library will fall back to a default software > implementation whose entry points are added by this commit. > I do agree with having sw dri

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] eventtimer: add default software implementation stub

2017-11-28 Thread Erik Gabriel Carrillo
If an eventdev PMD does not wish to provide event timer adapter ops definitions, the library will fall back to a default software implementation whose entry points are added by this commit. Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo --- lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile | 1 + lib/librte