On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 08:02:21PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-09-28 16:52, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> >
> > >
> > > 2016-09-28 14:30, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > > 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > > From: T
2016-09-28 16:52, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>
> >
> > 2016-09-28 14:30, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > > > 2016-09-28 11:
g>>, "Jerin Jacob" mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>>, "Shah, Rahul R"
mailto:rahul.r.shah at intel.com>>, "Lu, Wenzhuo"
mailto:wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
manag
2016-09-28 14:48, Iremonger, Bernard:
>
>
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for
> > > VF management
> > >
> > > 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas
2016-09-28 14:30, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > 2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > If we this way (force user to i
>
> 2016-09-28 14:30, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > > 2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > > > If we this way
2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > If we this way (force user to include driver specific headers and
> > > call driver specific functions), how you guys plan to make this
> > > funct
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-28 14:48, Iremonger, Bernard:
> >
> >
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librt
2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> If we this way (force user to include driver specific headers and call
> driver specific functions),
> how you guys plan to make this functionality available for multiple driver
> types.
Multiple drivers won't have exactly the same specific features.
But
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for
> > VF management
> >
> > 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > 2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev, Ko
tel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
> azelezniak
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-28 13:26, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > 2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev,
tel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
> azelezniak
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-28 11:23, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > If we this way (force user to include driver specific headers and
> > call driver specific funct
, 2016 3:13 PM
> > To: Richardson, Bruce
> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org; Jerin
> > Jacob ; Shah, Rahul R
> > ; Lu, Wenzhuo ;
> > azelezniak
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for
> > VF management
> >
&
Hi Bruce, Konstantin,
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> Hi lads,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger,
> > Bernard
> > Sent
nzhuo ;
> azelezniak
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
>
>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add
> > > > > > API's for VF
Hi Bruce,
> > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add
> > > > > API's for VF management
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-09-23 17:02, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mai
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:31:06AM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Bruce,
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> > management
> >
> > 2016-09-26 15:37, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > Hi
Hi Thomas, Bruce,
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-26 15:37, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > Hi Thomas, Bruce,
> >
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/
2016-09-26 15:37, Iremonger, Bernard:
> Hi Thomas, Bruce,
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> > management
> >
> > 2016-09-23 17:02, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thom
Hi Thomas, Bruce,
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-23 17:02, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > 2016-09-23 09:53, Richardson, Bruc
2016-09-23 17:02, Iremonger, Bernard:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-09-23 09:53, Richardson, Bruce:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > 2016-09-23 10:20, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:04:37PM +02
ak
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-23 09:53, Richardson, Bruce:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > 2016-09-23 10:20, Bruce Richardson:
> > >
2016-09-23 09:53, Richardson, Bruce:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-09-23 10:20, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 2016-09-15 16:46, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > > > > > Do we really need to expose
2016-09-23 10:20, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-09-15 16:46, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > > > Do we really need to expose VF specific functions here?
> > > > > > It can be generic(PF/VF) function indexed only through port_id.
> > > > >
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:36:21AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-09-23 10:20, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-09-15 16:46, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > > > > Do we really need to expose VF specific functions here?
> > > > > > >
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-09-15 16:46, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > > Do we really need to expose VF specific functions here?
> > > > > It can be generic(PF/VF) function indexed only through port_id.
> > > > > (example: as rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_anti_spoof
;
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-23 10:20, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:04:37PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 2016-09-15 16:46, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > > &g
2016-09-15 16:46, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > > Do we really need to expose VF specific functions here?
> > > > It can be generic(PF/VF) function indexed only through port_id.
> > > > (example: as rte_eth_dev_set_vlan_anti_spoof(uint8_t port_id,
> > > > uint8_t on)) For instance, In Thunderx PMD, We
Hi Thomas,
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> 2016-09-12 16:28, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:10:18AM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > > > Add new API functions
2016-09-12 16:28, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:10:18AM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > > Add new API functions to configure and manage VF's on a NIC.
> > >
> > > add rte_eth_dev_vf_ping function.
> > > add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_anti_spoof function.
> > > add rte_eth_dev_
Hi Jerin,
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] librte_ether: add API's for VF
> management
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:10:18AM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > Add new API functions to configure and manage VF's on a NIC.
> >
> > a
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:10:18AM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> Add new API functions to configure and manage VF's on a NIC.
>
> add rte_eth_dev_vf_ping function.
> add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_anti_spoof function.
> add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_mac_anti_spoof function.
>
> Signed-off-by: azeleznia
Add new API functions to configure and manage VF's on a NIC.
add rte_eth_dev_vf_ping function.
add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_anti_spoof function.
add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_mac_anti_spoof function.
Signed-off-by: azelezniak
add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_strip function.
add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_inser
33 matches
Mail list logo
