Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports

2019-11-11 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/31/2019 5:53 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/8/2019 3:23 PM, Yigit, Ferruh wrote: >> On 7/30/2019 4:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> Since the concept of representors was introduced, >>> we do not need any specific API for VF ports. >>> Any VF port should be able to be configured through >>>

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports

2019-10-31 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/8/2019 3:23 PM, Yigit, Ferruh wrote: > On 7/30/2019 4:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> Since the concept of representors was introduced, >> we do not need any specific API for VF ports. >> Any VF port should be able to be configured through >> its representor port in a more generic fashion. >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports

2019-10-08 Thread Yigit, Ferruh
On 7/30/2019 4:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Since the concept of representors was introduced, > we do not need any specific API for VF ports. > Any VF port should be able to be configured through > its representor port in a more generic fashion. I think we need a confirmation that functionality

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports

2019-07-31 Thread Ajit Khaparde
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:36 AM Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 7/30/19 6:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Since the concept of representors was introduced, > > we do not need any specific API for VF ports. > > Any VF port should be able to be configured through > > its representor port in a more g

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports

2019-07-31 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 7/30/19 6:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: Since the concept of representors was introduced, we do not need any specific API for VF ports. Any VF port should be able to be configured through its representor port in a more generic fashion. Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Acked-by: Andrew Rybche

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports

2019-07-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Since the concept of representors was introduced, we do not need any specific API for VF ports. Any VF port should be able to be configured through its representor port in a more generic fashion. Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon --- drivers/net/bnxt/rte_pmd_bnxt.h | 15 ++- drivers/n