Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] enic: fix assignment

2017-10-10 Thread John Daley (johndale)
Aaron, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:53 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] enic: fix assignment > > As it stands, the existing assingment to mbuf has

[dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/4] enic: fix assignment

2017-09-26 Thread Aaron Conole
As it stands, the existing assingment to mbuf has no effect outside of the function. Prior to this change, the mbuf argument would contain an invalid address, but it would not be null. After this change, the caller gets a null mbuf back. Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole --- drivers/net/enic/enic_ma