Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] nfp driver fixes

2018-04-13 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > Alejandro Lucero writes: > > > Hi Aaron, > > > > Thanks for this patches. > > > > I'm afraid these are not applicable for current NFP driver after commit > > Okay. > > > "net/nfp: add NFP CPP support" > > > > which has been accepted in dpdk-

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] nfp driver fixes

2018-04-13 Thread Aaron Conole
Alejandro Lucero writes: > Hi Aaron, > > Thanks for this patches. > > I'm afraid these are not applicable for current NFP driver after commit Okay. > "net/nfp: add NFP CPP support" > > which has been accepted in dpdk-net-next. I think nfp_acquire_process_lock() can be modified as I did in

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] nfp driver fixes

2018-04-13 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Hi Aaron, Thanks for this patches. I'm afraid these are not applicable for current NFP driver after commit "net/nfp: add NFP CPP support " which has been accepted in dpdk-net-next. However, those co

[dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/2] nfp driver fixes

2018-04-12 Thread Aaron Conole
Two fixes, one which is fairly obvious (1/2), the other which may allow support of non-root users. These patches are only compile tested which is why they are submitted as RFC. After a proper test, will resubmit them as PATCH (with any suggested / recommended changes). Aaron Conole (2): nfp: u