Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-03-05 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:44:01PM +, Doherty, Declan wrote: > On 13/02/2018 5:05 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Apologies for being late to this thread, I've read the ensuing discussion > > (hope I didn't miss any) and also think rte_flow could be improved in > > several ways to

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-02-26 Thread Doherty, Declan
On 13/02/2018 5:05 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: Hi, Apologies for being late to this thread, I've read the ensuing discussion (hope I didn't miss any) and also think rte_flow could be improved in several ways to enable TEP support, in particular regarding the ordering of actions. On the other ha

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-02-13 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
Hi, Apologies for being late to this thread, I've read the ensuing discussion (hope I didn't miss any) and also think rte_flow could be improved in several ways to enable TEP support, in particular regarding the ordering of actions. On the other hand I'm not sure a dedicated API for TEP is needed

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-02-01 Thread Shahaf Shuler
Hi Declan, sorry for the late response. Tuesday, January 23, 2018 5:36 PM, Doherty, Declan: > > If I get it right, the API proposed here is to have a tunnel endpoint which > > is > a logical port on top of ethdev port. the TEP is able to receive and monitor > some specific tunneled traffic, for

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-23 Thread Doherty, Declan
;t aware of devices which supported this type of function for overlaps, but it definitely sounds like we need to consider it here. -johnd -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Doherty, Declan Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 2:21 PM To: dev@dpdk.org Subject

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-23 Thread Doherty, Declan
On 16/01/2018 8:22 AM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:45 PM, John Daley: Hi Declan and Shahaf, I can't see how the existing ethdev API could be used for statistics as a single ethdev could be supporting may concurrent TEPs, therefore we would either need to use the extended

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-23 Thread Doherty, Declan
On 11/01/2018 9:45 PM, John Daley (johndale) wrote: Hi Declan and Shahaf, -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Doherty, Declan Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 9:31 AM To: Shahaf Shuler ; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-16 Thread Shahaf Shuler
Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:45 PM, John Daley: > Hi Declan and Shahaf, > > > I can't see how the existing > > ethdev API could be used for statistics as a single ethdev could be > > supporting may concurrent TEPs, therefore we would either need to use > > the extended stats with many entries, on

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-11 Thread John Daley (johndale)
Hi Declan and Shahaf, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Doherty, Declan > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 9:31 AM > To: Shahaf Shuler ; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement > &g

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-11 Thread John Daley (johndale)
r a new one? I think this would be the 1st meta-data match criteria in rte_flow, but I could see others following. -johnd > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Doherty, Declan > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 2:21 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org &g

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-10 Thread Doherty, Declan
Adding discussion back to list. On 24/12/2017 2:18 PM, Boris Pismenny wrote: Hi Declan On 12/22/2017 12:21 AM, Doherty, Declan wrote: This RFC contains a proposal to add a new tunnel endpoint API to DPDK that when used in conjunction with rte_flow enables the configuration of inline data path

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-09 Thread Doherty, Declan
On 24/12/2017 5:30 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: Hi Declan, Hey Shahaf, apologies for the delay in responding, I have been out of office for the last 2 weeks. Friday, December 22, 2017 12:21 AM, Doherty, Declan: This RFC contains a proposal to add a new tunnel endpoint API to DPDK that when us

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2018-01-02 Thread Boris Pismenny
Hi Declan, On 12/22/2017 12:21 AM, Doherty, Declan wrote: This RFC contains a proposal to add a new tunnel endpoint API to DPDK that when used in conjunction with rte_flow enables the configuration of inline data path encapsulation and decapsulation of tunnel endpoint network overlays on acce

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2017-12-24 Thread Shahaf Shuler
Hi Declan, Friday, December 22, 2017 12:21 AM, Doherty, Declan: > This RFC contains a proposal to add a new tunnel endpoint API to DPDK that > when used in conjunction with rte_flow enables the configuration of inline > data path encapsulation and decapsulation of tunnel endpoint network > overlay

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] tunnel endpoint hw acceleration enablement

2017-12-21 Thread Doherty, Declan
This RFC contains a proposal to add a new tunnel endpoint API to DPDK that when used in conjunction with rte_flow enables the configuration of inline data path encapsulation and decapsulation of tunnel endpoint network overlays on accelerated IO devices. The proposed new API would provide for th