Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Wiles, Keith
> On Jun 5, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:23:52 + > "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > >>> On Jun 5, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:10:05 + >>> "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'd propose in

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:23:52 + "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:10:05 + > > "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > > > > > I'd propose instead leader lcore - there is this idea that the leader > > is st

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Wiles, Keith
> On Jun 5, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:10:05 + > "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > > I'd propose instead leader lcore - there is this idea that the leader > is still a member of the team and will participate in the work. > > Lea

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:10:05 + "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > >>> > >>> I'd propose instead leader lcore - there is this idea that the leader > >>> is still a member of the team and will participate in the work. > >>> > >>> Leader / worker? > >>> > >> > >> I personally doubt such changes are ne

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Wiles, Keith
> On Jun 5, 2020, at 11:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:14:50 + > "Ananyev, Konstantin" wrote: > >>> organization is a little specific, with an lcore that does most init work >>> and spawns the others, but then runs the application like all others. >>> >>> I

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:14:50 + "Ananyev, Konstantin" wrote: > > organization is a little specific, with an lcore that does most init work > > and spawns the others, but then runs the application like all others. > > > > I'd propose instead leader lcore - there is this idea that the leader > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:43:00 +0200 Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > On 04/06/20 18:04 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I have a full patch that replaces the master/slave lcore > > naming (widely used in DPDK) with a better primary/secondary naming. > > > > For now this is just a trial balloon to see what

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On 05/06/20 12:28 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:43:00PM +0200, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > > On 04/06/20 18:04 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > I have a full patch that replaces the master/slave lcore > > > naming (widely used in DPDK) with a better primary/secondary na

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:43:00PM +0200, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > On 04/06/20 18:04 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I have a full patch that replaces the master/slave lcore > > naming (widely used in DPDK) with a better primary/secondary naming. > > > > For now this is just a trial balloon to se

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> > On 04/06/20 18:04 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I have a full patch that replaces the master/slave lcore > > naming (widely used in DPDK) with a better primary/secondary naming. > > > > For now this is just a trial balloon to see what the impact would > > look like. The change mostly aut

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-05 Thread Gaëtan Rivet
On 04/06/20 18:04 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I have a full patch that replaces the master/slave lcore > naming (widely used in DPDK) with a better primary/secondary naming. > > For now this is just a trial balloon to see what the impact would > look like. The change mostly automated so like

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] replace master/slave with primary/secondary

2020-06-04 Thread Stephen Hemminger
I have a full patch that replaces the master/slave lcore naming (widely used in DPDK) with a better primary/secondary naming. For now this is just a trial balloon to see what the impact would look like. The change mostly automated so likely that things are broken. It is hard to break a change lik