Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-05 Thread Aaron Conole
Stephen Hemminger writes: > For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort > to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change > is just syntax, but it has bigger impacts. > > Lets announce this now and do it in the next API changing > release. > --- Okay. Usually, I a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:54:47AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 14:02 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort > > to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change > > is just syntax, but it has bigger impac

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 14:02 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort > to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change > is just syntax, but it has bigger impacts. > > Lets announce this now and do it in the next API changing > re

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] doc: change to diverse and inclusive language

2020-06-04 Thread Stephen Hemminger
For diversity reasons, the DPDK should take every effort to eliminate master and slave terminology. The actual code change is just syntax, but it has bigger impacts. Lets announce this now and do it in the next API changing release. --- doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 27 ++