On 01/23/2016 04:22 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> On 1/22/16, 1:45 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote:
>> We wouldn't be discussing this if it was not an issue. It is offensive
>> enough to turn away both users and contributors, and merely speeding up
>> a bit is not going to make it a whole lot better.
>>
>
On 1/22/16, 1:45 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote:
>On 01/21/2016 05:03 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> On 1/21/16, 2:46 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/20/2016 06:26 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" >>> dpdk.org on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing
On 01/21/2016 05:03 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> On 1/21/16, 2:46 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote:
>
>> On 01/20/2016 06:26 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>> On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" >> dpdk.org on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing.net> wrote:
>>>
Hello,
Since the pktge
On 1/21/16, 2:46 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote:
>On 01/20/2016 06:26 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" > dpdk.org on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00:14AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I would rip out the whole tty control and theming nonsense and then
> just print one line copyright on startup.
Personally, I might have put this sentiment more diplomatically, but a
refactor effort such as this would make life
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:03:37 +
"Wiles, Keith" wrote:
> On 1/21/16, 2:46 AM, "Panu Matilainen" wrote:
>
> >On 01/20/2016 06:26 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >> On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" >> dpdk.org on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
On 01/20/2016 06:26 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" dpdk.org on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through it
>> and experiment and see if I can get it working.
>
On 1/20/16 8:26 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> One problem is a number of people wanted to steal the code and use in a paid
> application, so the copyright is some what a requirement. As you may know I
> do a lot of debugging on Pktgen and I feel they are a nuisance. I can try to
> see if we can clea
On 1/20/16, 10:26 AM, "dev on behalf of Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" on behalf of mhall at mhcomputing.net> wrote:
>
>>Hello,
Please try modifying pktgen-main.c:main() at the top of the function to this:
wr_scrn_setw(1);/* Reset the
On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through it
>and experiment and see if I can get it working.
>
>I have issues with the init process of pktgen. It is difficult to debug
>it because the init code
On 1/20/16, 12:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Matthew Hall" wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I have some comments below, but will address your full email later when I have
a bit more time.
>Hello,
>
>Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through it
>and experiment and see if I can get it
On 01/20/2016 08:32 AM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through it
> and experiment and see if I can get it working.
>
> I have issues with the init process of pktgen. It is difficult to debug
> it because the init code does a lot of ve
Hello,
Since the pktgen code is reindented I am finding time to read through it
and experiment and see if I can get it working.
I have issues with the init process of pktgen. It is difficult to debug
it because the init code does a lot of very scary stuff to the terminal
control / TTY device a
13 matches
Mail list logo
