Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2018-01-05 Thread Neil Horman
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:08:52PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 04/01/2018 13:56, Neil Horman: > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > > Thomas- > > > I just noticed that the ci tests are failing on the intel compiler, > > > which > > > makes very little sense

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2018-01-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
04/01/2018 13:56, Neil Horman: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > Thomas- > > I just noticed that the ci tests are failing on the intel compiler, > > which > > makes very little sense to me, as the error is a permission error on a bash > > script that added in

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2018-01-04 Thread Neil Horman
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:07:52PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:36:15PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > > Hey all- > > > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I > > > woul

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-30 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:07:52PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:36:15PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > Hey all- > > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I > > would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-12 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com] > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 7:36 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Mcnamara, John ; > > Richardson, Bruce > > Subject

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-12 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > > > On Dec 11, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > > > > Hey all- > > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I > > would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-12 Thread Wiles, Keith
> On Dec 11, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > > Hey all- > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I > would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered safe > because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John M. asked me

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-12 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 7:36 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Mcnamara, John ; > Richardson, Bruce > Subject: [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging > > Hey all- > A few

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-12 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:36:15PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > Hey all- > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I > would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered safe > because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John M. ask

[dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

2017-12-11 Thread Neil Horman
Hey all- A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered safe because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John M. asked me then what I might do to improve the situation, and the follow