Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/5] lib/distributor: use wait event scheme

2021-11-01 Thread David Hunt
On 29/10/2021 2:58 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM Feifei Wang wrote: Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use wait event for this case. Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang With the change in the subject as distributor: ... Probably can b

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/5] lib/distributor: use wait event scheme

2021-10-31 Thread David Marchand
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:58 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM Feifei Wang wrote: > > > > Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use > > wait event for this case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang > > > With the change in the subjec

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/5] lib/distributor: use wait event scheme

2021-10-29 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM Feifei Wang wrote: > > Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use > wait event for this case. > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang With the change in the subject as distributor: ... Probably can be fixed in merge time. Acked-by: Je

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/5] lib/distributor: use wait event scheme

2021-10-29 Thread Feifei Wang
Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use wait event for this case. Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang --- lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c | 10 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c