[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/9] Dynamic memzones

2015-10-14 Thread Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
On 14/10/2015 01:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:57:04 +0100 > Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: > >> Current implemetation allows reserving/creating memzones but not the opposite >> (unreserve/free). This affects mempools and other memzone based objects. >> >> From my point of

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/9] Dynamic memzones

2015-10-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:57:04 +0100 Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: > Current implemetation allows reserving/creating memzones but not the opposite > (unreserve/free). This affects mempools and other memzone based objects. > > From my point of view, implementing free functionality for memzones woul

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/9] Dynamic memzones

2015-07-14 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
Current implemetation allows reserving/creating memzones but not the opposite (unreserve/free). This affects mempools and other memzone based objects. >From my point of view, implementing free functionality for memzones would look like malloc over memsegs. Thus, this approach moves malloc inside e