Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] examples/l3fwd: fix LPM IPv6 subnets

2021-04-15 Thread Walsh, Conor
> > > > The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet > > > > > > {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0}, > > > {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 1}, > > > etc... > > > > > > Err... all those subnets were exactly == 2001:200::/48. > > > I

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] examples/l3fwd: fix LPM IPv6 subnets

2021-04-15 Thread David Marchand
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:44 AM Walsh, Conor wrote: > > > > > > > > > The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet > > > > {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0}, > > {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 1}, > > etc... > > > > Err... all t

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] examples/l3fwd: fix LPM IPv6 subnets

2021-04-15 Thread Walsh, Conor
> > > > The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet > > {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0}, > {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 1}, > etc... > > Err... all those subnets were exactly == 2001:200::/48. > Is the issue that the examp

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] examples/l3fwd: fix LPM IPv6 subnets

2021-04-14 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:11 PM Conor Walsh wrote: > > The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0}, {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 1}, etc... Err... all those subnets were exactly == 2001:200::/

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] examples/l3fwd: fix LPM IPv6 subnets

2021-04-06 Thread Conor Walsh
The IPv6 subnets used were not within the 2001:200::/48 subnet Changed to 2001:200:0:{0-7}::/64 where 0-7 is the port ID Fixes: 37afe381bde4 ("examples/l3fwd: use reserved IP addresses") Signed-off-by: Conor Walsh Acked-by: Vladimir Medvedkin --- examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 26 +++