Thursday, March 29, 2018 5:53 PM, Doherty, Declan:
> On 29/03/2018 7:13 AM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> > Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:54 PM, Declan Doherty:
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v6 4/8] ethdev: Add port representor device
> >> flag
> >>
> >> Add n
On 29/03/2018 7:13 AM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:54 PM, Declan Doherty:
Subject: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v6 4/8] ethdev: Add port representor device flag
Add new device flag to specify that ethdev port is a port representor.
Extend rte_eth_dev_info structure to expose device
29/03/2018 08:13, Shahaf Shuler:
> And device attributes like : RTE_ETH_DEV_BONDED_SLAVE and
> RTE_ETH_DEV_REPRESENTOR.
> I don't think they belong together under the genetic name of dev_flags.
>
> Moreover, I am not sure the fact device is bonded slave should be exposed to
> the application. I
Wednesday, March 28, 2018 4:54 PM, Declan Doherty:
> Subject: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v6 4/8] ethdev: Add port representor device flag
>
> Add new device flag to specify that ethdev port is a port representor.
> Extend rte_eth_dev_info structure to expose device flags to user which
> enab
Add new device flag to specify that ethdev port is a port representor.
Extend rte_eth_dev_info structure to expose device flags to user which
enable applications to discover if a port is a representor port.
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 1 +
lib/li
5 matches
Mail list logo
